Skip to content
Brett D. Henderson Frame-Indexed Classical Theism

Podcast & media kit

A guest who brought the argument, not the anecdotes.

Brett D. Henderson argues that sovereignty versus free will and the problem of evil are not mysteries — they are one formal error, made repeatedly. It is a strong claim, it is defended in formal notation, and it makes for an episode where the host can push and the guest gets better under pressure.

Why this conversation lands right now

Young men are returning to church for arguments, not affirmations.

The apologetics-and-debate audience is the fastest-growing serious-theology segment, and it rewards shows that take a claim seriously enough to attack it. This framework gives a host something specific to attack: that Calvinism, Arminianism and Molinism reconcile at the foundational level, and that the problem of evil is formally dissolvable.

  • A guest who prefers hard pushback to a friendly interview — the work was written for scrutiny.
  • Prepared angles and questions you can read cold, including the ones that hurt.
  • Free review copies of any title for you and your producer, on request.

Four episodes that work

  1. The Many Beings Fallacy in sixty seconds

    The one error sitting underneath five classical dilemmas — stated plainly enough for a general audience.

  2. Calvinism vs. Arminianism: a category mistake?

    How both sides can be right within their own frame, and what that does to a five-hundred-year-old fight.

  3. The problem of evil, dissolved rather than answered

    Why the most-cited reason for deconversion may be a malformed question rather than a hard one.

  4. Formal logic in theology: gatekeeping or honesty?

    Why showing the inferences invites refutation instead of hiding behind mystery.

Press assets

Everything you need, without emailing first.

Bios written to be read cold, cover art at full resolution, and review copies on request. If something you need is not here, ask and it will be sent the same day.

One line — for the intro

Brett D. Henderson is the author of The Many Beings Framework, a seven-volume research programme arguing that the Church’s oldest dilemmas are formal errors rather than mysteries.

Short — for show notes

Brett D. Henderson writes analytic philosophical theology. His seven-volume series The Many Beings Framework argues that the classical dilemmas — sovereignty against free will, a good God against a world of suffering, eternity against time — are not mysteries but artifacts of one repeated mistake: taking a term defined inside the human mode of existence and applying it univocally to God. He also writes The Shepherd’s Path, a seven-book series on church leadership.

Full — for a press page

Brett D. Henderson is the author of The Many Beings Framework, a seven-volume research programme in analytic philosophical theology that formalises Thomistic analogy, Boethian eternity and the Reformed archetypal/ectypal distinction into a single system with stated discipline rules. He calls the error the framework names the Many Beings Fallacy, and the position it defends Frame-Indexed Classical Theism. Each volume takes one classical dilemma, states its definitions, shows its inferences, and engages the tradition at full strength rather than in summary — a deliberate choice, on the grounds that a framework which cannot be attacked precisely cannot be trusted precisely. Volumes One through Three are available now, with Volume One free on Kindle. He also writes The Shepherd’s Path, a seven-book series on church leadership for pastors who want to steward the natural gifts as seriously as they pray for the miraculous.

Cover art and the diagram may be used freely in episode artwork, show notes and articles about the books. No permission needed, and no attribution required beyond the title.

Sample questions

Questions worth asking — including the hard ones.

Read these cold if you like. The last three are the ones that could sink the framework, and they are the ones that make the best listening.

  • You claim the free-will debate is not hard, it’s malformed. Defend that.
  • Give me the Many Beings Fallacy in language my listeners will follow on a commute.
  • If Calvinists and Arminians are both right, what exactly have they been arguing about for five centuries?
  • If God’s “goodness” isn’t our “goodness,” haven’t you emptied the word?
  • What would it take to falsify this framework?
  • Which objection has come closest to landing, and why didn’t it?
  • Why should a layperson care about frame-indexing at all?

Free — the complete book

Take a copy before you decide.

Volume One free, in full. Producers and hosts can request any other title in the catalogue on the form above.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.

Bio

About Brett D. Henderson

Brett D. Henderson is the author of The Many Beings Framework, a seven-volume research programme in analytic philosophical theology. His work formalises Thomistic analogy, Boethian eternity and the Reformed archetypal / ectypal distinction into a single system with stated discipline rules that make violations detectable.

He argues that the Church’s oldest dilemmas are neither mysteries nor contradictions, but instances of one formal mistake committed so consistently it went unnamed: the Many Beings Fallacy. The books are published in formal notation for peer scrutiny.

He also writes The Shepherd’s Path, a seven-book series on church leadership.

Cover of Resolving the Free Will Dilemma

Free — the complete book

Prepping an episode? Start with Volume One.

The complete book, free. Enough to build an interview from without reading seven volumes first — and review copies of any other title go out on request.

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click.